Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

June 25 2017

snuggle
snuggle
6575 9e43
Reposted byLogHiMaMrCoffe

June 24 2017

snuggle
5233 c2ea 500
Reposted frombardzosmaczny bardzosmaczny viawaaaaargh waaaaargh
snuggle
Wedding´s finest.
snuggle
0086 e5fe
Reposted fromaunds aunds viasofias sofias

June 23 2017

snuggle
Reposted fromFlau Flau viaKane1337 Kane1337
snuggle
Reposted fromcool-carlos cool-carlos viaeyelyn eyelyn
snuggle
3914 9897
Reposted fromgreensky greensky viavaira vaira
snuggle
2190 c8a6
Reposted fromsz sz viavaira vaira

June 21 2017

snuggle
The funny thing is that he doesn´t realize that, apart from some really fringy fringe groups, all whites are usually not blamed for white supremacist´s acts. Which would be the analogy of blaming all muslims for Islamists acts/ of a "moderate muslim" condemning ISIS. Or did I not get the satire right again?
snuggle
Hey, sorry for the late reply, I have been sort of busy.

I would not know wether power is the dominant factor in pedophiles sexual desires. This is definitively not true for (all of) the conscious ones. I think I must have expressed myself unclearly. I´ll give it another go:
There is a clear disparity of power between children and adults/postpubescent people on many levels (strength, bodyly readyness for intercourse, social power, intelectual and mental capabilities and resources, etc.).  The fact that sexual desires manifest themselves in this context means, that an egalitarian sort of intercourse is imposible outside of the realm of fantasy. Therefore the disparity of power is always very present in such situations. It is the definig moment of it, and therefore also central to the cathexis of the child ("the powerless") as a sexual object. This does not mean that pedophiles may not negate or otherwise supress that fact.

It is similar with the seduction argument you mentioned: Of course you can construe that the behaviour of a child is meant as a (genital) sexual advance. Typical affectionate behaviours of children, like kissing, snuggling and twinking are very common modes of interactions between childrens and their caretakers and other people they trust. They are bonding behaviours. Just like when children "show off" their genitals. Of course they are similar to seductive behaviours - caretakers transfer "seductive" behaviour to children the same way that the child, once it is grown up, will transfer what it learned from it´s caretakers into sexual bonding and seduction situations. Laplanche´s general seduction theory does a great job explaining the interwinedness of both in my opinion. When a helthy child performs such behaviours it is however an invitation to bond, not to establish a genital sexual bond/contact/interaction. This is culturally known, a pedophile might deny this conciously, but when he does so he is completely in denial about all common knowlege about interactions between adults and children.

tl.dr: when a child smooches an adult it is an invitation to him to take care of him, not to have sex, and this is fairly obvious.

"to fulfill their urges and satisfy their conscience, they construct a world wherein children can indeed consent"

couldn´t have put it better =)

cheers

June 20 2017

snuggle
4546 44b3 500
Reposted fromtichga tichga viaaperture aperture

June 24 2017

snuggle
Wedding´s finest.
snuggle
0086 e5fe
Reposted fromaunds aunds viasofias sofias

June 23 2017

snuggle
Reposted fromFlau Flau viaKane1337 Kane1337
snuggle
Reposted fromcool-carlos cool-carlos viaeyelyn eyelyn
snuggle
3914 9897
Reposted fromgreensky greensky viavaira vaira
snuggle
2190 c8a6
Reposted fromsz sz viavaira vaira

June 21 2017

snuggle
The funny thing is that he doesn´t realize that, apart from some really fringy fringe groups, all whites are usually not blamed for white supremacist´s acts. Which would be the analogy of blaming all muslims for Islamists acts/ of a "moderate muslim" condemning ISIS. Or did I not get the satire right again?
snuggle
Hey, sorry for the late reply, I have been sort of busy.

I would not know wether power is the dominant factor in pedophiles sexual desires. This is definitively not true for (all of) the conscious ones. I think I must have expressed myself unclearly. I´ll give it another go:
There is a clear disparity of power between children and adults/postpubescent people on many levels (strength, bodyly readyness for intercourse, social power, intelectual and mental capabilities and resources, etc.).  The fact that sexual desires manifest themselves in this context means, that an egalitarian sort of intercourse is imposible outside of the realm of fantasy. Therefore the disparity of power is always very present in such situations. It is the definig moment of it, and therefore also central to the cathexis of the child ("the powerless") as a sexual object. This does not mean that pedophiles may not negate or otherwise supress that fact.

It is similar with the seduction argument you mentioned: Of course you can construe that the behaviour of a child is meant as a (genital) sexual advance. Typical affectionate behaviours of children, like kissing, snuggling and twinking are very common modes of interactions between childrens and their caretakers and other people they trust. They are bonding behaviours. Just like when children "show off" their genitals. Of course they are similar to seductive behaviours - caretakers transfer "seductive" behaviour to children the same way that the child, once it is grown up, will transfer what it learned from it´s caretakers into sexual bonding and seduction situations. Laplanche´s general seduction theory does a great job explaining the interwinedness of both in my opinion. When a helthy child performs such behaviours it is however an invitation to bond, not to establish a genital sexual bond/contact/interaction. This is culturally known, a pedophile might deny this conciously, but when he does so he is completely in denial about all common knowlege about interactions between adults and children.

tl.dr: when a child smooches an adult it is an invitation to him to take care of him, not to have sex, and this is fairly obvious.

"to fulfill their urges and satisfy their conscience, they construct a world wherein children can indeed consent"

couldn´t have put it better =)

cheers
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl